what affirmative defenses must be pled

So, we cut and paste the list of affirmative defenses listed in MCR 2.111(F)(3) and we file these defenses with the court. Page, Commission If the answer to either question is no, then the affirmative defense should be stricken. i A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled. Affirmative defenses are legal defenses that raise new facts or issues not raised in the Complaint. Prescription. Video, Broadcast TV, News, & Photos, Live 49ViuPw-VOpQ^oZ=U kJ zqAPo#; ad q >D~_$&u G`5~GxE-wlx BV-biW;1whu\u^,zl;$S~FB]z1 oH!^%L-ky%N)]tCm(*m%2dqXI4D\I"XHYi An affirmative defense is a reason given by the defendant for why the plaintiff should not win the lawsuit, even if what the plaintiff says is true. Review, Minnesota Issues Thereafter, the plaintiff must file a reply to the affirmative defense. (1) In General. Indeed, a defense will be stricken if it is insufficient as a matter of law. During RHCTs tenure, RHCT entered an equipment lease agreement with ASI (the Lease) for certain inland marine equipment, then valued by ASI at approximately $10 million (the Equipment). Hawes v. Ryder, 100 Mass. All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth inRule 11. ?CAK:3SzlP:kJw. endobj Library, House 0000000016 00000 n Farrell Fritz, P.C. II. Affirmative Defense - Waiver CACI No. Search & Status (House), Bill 14 0 obj The Committee Note was revised to delete statements that were over-simplified. Committee Discovery Sanctions Alert: Failure to Include Withheld Items on Privilege Log Lands Party in Hot Water, Commercial Division Grants $1 Million Punitive-Damage Award for Diversion of Companys IP in Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Commercial Division Says Not Every Storm Triggers Force Majeure, LIMITS ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE: A NEW PROPOSAL TO AMEND COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULE 27, Infancy or other disability of the defendant. Before a litigant can competently evaluate whether an asserted affirmative defense should be attacked with a motion to strike, knowledge of what constitutes such a defense is required. endobj ", "Second, the declaration shall state concisely and with substantial certainty the substantive facts necessary to constitute the cause of action.". A savvy litigatorshould keep arobust checklist of affirmative defenses,which should includethe affirmative defenses listed in CPLR 3018(b), as well as the grounds for dismissal under CPLR 3211(a). Five days later, RHCT informed ASl that the second location was not acceptable, primarily because the owner of the site did not give RHCT permission to store the Equipment at that location. Accordingly, RHCT has waived the illegality defense. A provision of like import is of frequent occurrence in the codes. New Yorks Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) 3018(b) provides that a party must plead as an affirmative defense all matters which if not pleaded would be likely to take the adverse party by surprise or would raise issues of fact not appearing on the face of a prior pleading. CPLR 3018(b) lists the defenses commonly asserted, including facts showing illegality either by statute or common law, but makes it clear that the list is not exhaustive. A .mass.gov website belongs to an official government organization in Massachusetts. This rule supersedes the methods of pleading prescribed in U.S.C., Title 19, 508 (Persons making seizures pleading general issue and providing special matter); U.S.C., Title 35, [former] 40d (Providing under general issue, upon notice, that a statement in application for an extended patent is not true), 69 [now 282] (Pleading and proof in actions for infringement) and similar statutes. <<46F35B8151BFF6428C703D4C7CE8A790>]/Prev 41333>> Labels, Joint Departments, The strictures ofRule 11apply to encourage admission of those allegations which defendant knows to be true, even if without such admission, plaintiff would be put to expense or difficulty in proving them, or might even be unable to prove them at all. SeeG.L. Read court documents, court records online and search Trellis.law comprehensive legal database for any state court documents. Accordingly, the answer must serially respond to each paragraph of the complaint (with an exception to be discussed shortly). Commission (LCC), Legislative-Citizen Commission 0000005594 00000 n 69, 73 (1861), as well as under the Federal Rules, such estoppel is of doubtful validity; nonetheless cautious counsel for defendants will probably wish to preface affirmative defenses with some such language as: "If plaintiff suffered injury, as in his complaint is alleged, which is denied. c. 231, 29 andG.L. 708, 137 N.E. Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes, 700 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Committee Schedule, Committee Thereafter, the parties moved for partial summary judgment. It should be emphasized that Rule 8(a)(1) does not alter the statutory requirements regarding the omission of names in Superior Court divorce proceedings, G.L. (d) Pleading to Be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency. Xd9;T )(}0kp'bKovYM[#Bvk /qqNnrq`0lut>VSRmtjOuR)V$_-/#="pV7 A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial. Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. Me? Who Represents 2016). PB |\MF,S5^*;eKS/\itQ3)+u+e27!,vqYv;+{?S[l|.Q7mG|\{54Ye@ggv,EB ^r`a u}x-{) SWcs`#.Yt0f1PQSdm1sR[RzXwsK6~] Sw"fVpQ"]dSFpQ9NOB? xb```f``{x(O^07GPrIl(5iH|xDm)0?"B @,6@ ;0 Changes Made After Publication and Comment. & Task Forces, Bills In Conference Id. 1720. ), Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1937. endstream endobj 436 0 obj <>stream T o succeed, [name of defendant] must prove both of the following by clear. Laws, Statutes, For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. Among other claims, the plaintiff contends that your client breached his agreement to sell widgets. 30, 2007, eff. A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as he has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or equitable grounds. A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as the party has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or equitable grounds or both. . RHCT has not shown that it previously raised a concern about trespassing or illegality. 2d 1054, 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). That [name of plaintiff] knew [name of defendant] was required to [insert . If, however, a litigant fails to raise a particular defense in its answer or CPLR 3211(a) motion, the defendant may still have hope of raising the defense at the summary judgment stage, so long as the defense does not take the adverse party by surprise. With respect to the first affirmative defense, respondent pled that because the pond constructed on the subject parcel is a permissible Gatt v. Keyes Corp., 446 So. In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including: accord and satisfaction; arbitration and award; assumption of risk; contributory negligence; duress; estoppel; failure of consideration; fraud; illegality; Each separate cause of action upon which a separate recovery . T 7. Your analysis of the contract claim leads you to conclude that the contract is void because performance would require your client to violate certain labor laws. (1930) 55085514. denied, 364 U.S. 895, 81 S.Ct. Roster, Upcoming Discharge in bankruptcy. The absence of prejudice or surprise to the plaintiffwas the key factor for Justice Emerson in permitting thedefendants partial-constructive-eviction defense. c. 208, 10. Courts will, from time-to-time, consider an unpleaded defense ifthe adverse party has notice of it through channels other than the answer. "/{^OY:N9BIYkW[1f$( hi!ARX8u;q%2V_9Z4U4neac?m MwlPZ8#+V[N. CPLR 3018 is clear: an affirmative defense must be pleaded to be preserved. and convincing evidence: 1. %PDF-1.4 % 28, 2010, eff. In Texas, defendants must assert affirmative defenses in their Answer at the beginning of the case or risk not being able to use them later. Pleading requirements for affirmative defenses: The answer must "state in short and plain terms" the defendant's defenses to each claim asserted against it. F.2d 880, 885 (9th Cir.1983). Purchase the print edition of the 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for $19.50. endobj *EDqv6[*Z.:sI/*D^nG)~R (2) If the averments are contained in a pleading to which responsive pleading is not authorized, all averments are automatically taken to have been denied. . But simply listing affirmative defenses is not enough. . 0000000910 00000 n Council, Schedules, Calendars, A tell-tale sign of a fake affirmative defense is one that asserts a generic legal principle such as "Rewriting of the Agreement by the Court is Barred." hXM#Z|rX*e1j_J t~?|A?mv3'W#VDeXl{ziFQm?/`^Yg?a]%K/jdk8vp<2Gu&9>7w45/||?o_1qgaqc:4yCy=" %$[s# .". In contrast, an affirmative defense is a defense that, if proven, would mitigate or eradicate the defendant's negligent conduct alleged in the complaint. The signature to an instrument set forth in any pleading shall be taken as admitted unless a party specifically denies its genuineness. 146 16 Topic (Index), Rules ls;+~s& g++1P(r5"ba%BN`/LbiT7CtsDF AKe{skzg;U}JYA:9>5k?irU&^/+3^l"_D~%QO D[ Gov. See G.L. Johnson answered and pled "the affirmative defense of the four (4) year Statute of . Your client comes to you with a complaint that was recently served on him. If an asserted affirmative defense is not an affirmative defense at all, but rather consists of opinions, theories, legal conclusions, or argument, then a motion to strike should also attack it on this basis. The Suffolk County Commercial Division (Emerson, J.) Commission on Pensions & Retirement (LCPR), Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage If you want fraud as an affirmative defense in a breach of contract case, how might you assert it? Schedule, Audio That was the holding of the Appellate Division, First Department in American Stevedoring, Inc. v. Red Hook Container Terminal, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 08470 (1st Dept. See S.J.C. *X H y0[.\1)_} 0)7l5 H 2d 49, 51 (Fla. 1990). Programs, Pronunciation Moreover, all affirmative defense elements must be pled. [FRCP 8(b)(1)(A); "Fair notice" requirement: An affirmative defense must be pleaded with enough specificity or factual particularity to give plaintiff "fair notice" of the . (2)G.L. Behind Rule 8(b) lies the simple principle that a defendant's answer should unmistakably indicate to both Court and plaintiff precisely which aspects of the complaint are admitted, and which are controverted. The firm is committed to the zealous representation of its clients and the effective use of their resources in litigation involving business and commercial disputes. The affirmative defenses were first addressed in a ruling of the Chief ALJ dated December 12, 2014 (December 12, 2014 Ruling). It is a breach of counsel's obligation to the court to file an answer creating issues that counsel does not affirmatively believe have a basis.". Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied. affirmative defense must be pled to avoid unfair surprise or prejudice to the plaintiff. A mere denial of the facts alleged in a complaint or counterclaim is not an affirmative defense and, as such, affirmative defenses asserting mere denials should be stricken. Unless the pleader intends in good faith to controvert all the averments of the preceding pleading, he may make his denials as specific denials of designated averments or paragraphs, or he may generally deny all the averments except such designated averments or paragraphs as he expressly admits; but, when he does so intend to controvert all its averments, he may do so by general denial subject to the obligations set forth inRule 11. Changed (Table 2), Rules by Auditor, Revisor If it is not so pleaded, it is waived. A party shall state in short and plain terms his defenses to such claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the adverse party relies. P. 1.140 (f). If either of these are absent, then a plaintiff/counter-plaintiff should strongly consider moving to strike the deficient affirmative defense. Fla. R. Civ. In equity, however, an answer could state as many defenses, in the alternative, regardless of consistency, as the defendant deemed essential to his defense. An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. Illegality. c9Id 1^d[(l1--_>e~rMI)XcJU? However, they are not the same. That part of former G.L. Merger is now successfully accomplished. h214R0Pw/+QL)6)C(0e4A(1X.V? U? Prior to RHCT, American Stevedoring, Inc. (ASI) provided those services at the Brooklyn Terminal. %Ar1[qSW=W6]14T<2r2Q$4;L~G2_GDdF C:JaG!YJd)^p|"?3_M5] Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied. A party may set out 2 or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in a single count or defense or in separate ones. 0 0000006151 00000 n Former recovery. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. (a) Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. 18 13 xref And so, lawyers tasked with drafting an answer will oftenconsult a checklist to ensure that all relevant affirmative defenses are sufficiently pleaded. Meetings, Standing Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded. G.L. Schedules, Order 0000002937 00000 n An official website of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, This page, Civil Procedure Rule 8: General rules of pleading, is. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, shall contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and a demand for judgment for the relief sought; if a recovery of money is demanded, the amount shall be stated. While RHCT has referred to the issue of having the permission of the site owner during the pendency of this case, for example, by demanding that ASI provide evidence of permission to use the site when the Third Location was specified, the issue appears to have been touched on only in the context of questioning whether RHCT would be able to access the site and complete delivery. Freiberger Haber LLP is a national law firm located in Melville Long Island & New York City. 4 0 obj ,#R({H8d3v+|"}R (d) Effect of Failure to Deny. Indeed, the plain language of the court rule requires a party asserting affirmative defenses to "state the facts constituting" the affirmative defenses listed. 13 0 obj It does not, however, seek to regulate the substantive question of distribution of the burden of producing evidence or of persuading the trier of fact. stream <]>> endstream endobj 435 0 obj <>stream }F>T.u}el;KL`spG3))epGe+Z`*Wp)/xGt>(h 8:)k,sjz*fc0'nF[DX]}G1uKsjAJz/ 7:2yV^,bm(U=JO_%( ^:As Nvwe4 Guide, Address Note to Subdivision (d). xref LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and (except on the iOS app) to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. (2)A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. 2, 1987, eff. 0000002593 00000 n c. 185, 28, 29;c. 237, 3;c. 240, 1. Title III Pleadings and Motions (Rules 7-16), 2014-2023 The National Court Rules Committee, Purchase the 2023 Edition of the Federal Rules of civil Procedure for just $19.50, Title I Scope of Rules; Form of Action (Rules 1 and 2), Title II Commencing an Action; Service of Process; Pleadings, Motions, and Orders (Rules 3-6), Title V Disclosures and Discovery (Rules 26-37), Title VIII Provisional and Final Remedies (Rules 64-71), Title IX Special Proceedings (Rules 71-73), Title X District Courts and Clerks: Conducting Business; Issuing Orders (Rules 77-80), Title XI General Provisions (Rules 81-86), Title XII Appendix of Forms [Abrogated], Title XIII Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (Rules A-G). <> DFL/GOP, House Woodfield, the court held that a defendant "must plead an affirmative defense with enough specificity or factual Rule 1.140(b) is used to strike insufficient legal defenses, and Rule 1.140(f) is used to strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from a pleading. However, G.L. (3) General and Specific Denials. endobj If a party is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. If you need assistance, please contact the Trial Court Law Libraries. trailer 9 0 obj Rules, Address c. 231, 7 (Sixth) (providing that a plaintiff shall not be required to elect between causes of action where the remedies are inconsistent). Certain statutes pertaining to real estate may, however, require unique particularity. Session Daily, Senate Media In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively any matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense including but not limited to the following: accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of a condition Committees, Joint Committees The defendant opposed the motion, asserting apartial-constructive-eviction defense,and cross-moved for leave to amend its answer to assert two counterclaims against the plaintiff. 0000003981 00000 n & reports. <> ASI asserted many claims against RHCT, including one for breach of contract. % at 834. of Manhasset Med. An affirmative defense may be insufficient either as a matter of law or as a matter of pleading. for the Day, Supplemental Such an "affirmative defense" will very likely be no affirmative defense at all when viewed against the causes of action in the case at bar. 19, r. 15 and N.Y.C.P.A. 1 0 obj Rule 2:12. <> 0000000968 00000 n In the occasional case where the plaintiff does not have valid claim, a trial can still be avoided by the use of discovery and either a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Rule 12(b)(6)), or a motion for summary judgment (Rule 56). The only Massachusetts statutes dealing with this point, G.L. Other courts using Federal Rule type pleading have given great weight to common law c. 231, 85A,85B, and85Cwould likely entail a revision of the rule. SeeRock-Ola Mfg. 0000006665 00000 n Under previous Massachusetts law, besides being unable to join legal and equitable claims in one pleading, a plaintiff could not join causes of action unless they arose out of the same manner (G.L. Please do not include personal or contact information. All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice. More often, however, particularized pleadings merely result in wasted time and effort, because the claimed defects are matters of form which are subsequently corrected by amendment. Ins. If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient. In granting partial summary judgment, the court rejected RHCTs illegality argument because it was not pleaded as an affirmative defense. Massachusetts rules of court and standing orders, Rule 4.3: Arrest: Supplementary process: Ne exeat, Rule 5: Service and filing of pleadings and other papers, Rule 15: Amended and supplemental pleadings, Rule 16: Pre-trial procedure: Formulating issues, Rule 17: Parties plaintiff and defendant: Capacity, Rule 19: Joinder of persons needed for just adjudication, Rule 21: Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties, Rule 23.1: Derivative actions by shareholders, Rule 23.2: Actions relating to unincorporated associations, Rule 26: General provisions governing discovery, Rule 27: Depositions before action or pending appeal, Rule 28: Persons before whom depositions may be taken, Rule 29: Stipulations regarding discovery procedure, Rule 30: Depositions upon oral examination, Rule 31: Depositions of witnesses upon written questions, Rule 32: Use of depositions in court proceedings, Rule 34: Producing documents, electronically stored information, and tangible t, Rule 35: Physical and mental examination of persons, Rule 37: Failure to make discovery: Sanctions, Rule 40: Assignment of cases for trial: Continuances, Rule 48: Number of jurors - Majority verdict, Rule 49: Special verdicts and interrogatories, Rule 50: Motion for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the ver, Rule 55.1: Special requirements for defaults and default judgments for certain , Rule 59: New trials: Amendment of judgments, Rule 62: Stay of proceedings to enforce a judgment, Rule 65.1: Security: Proceedings against security provider, Rule 65.2: Redelivery of goods or chattels, Rule 65.3: Proceedings for civil contempt, Rule 70: Judgment for specific acts: Vesting title, Rule 71: Process in behalf of and against persons not parties, Rule 79: Books and records kept by the clerk and entries therein, Rule 80: Stenographic report or transcript, Rule 82: Jurisdiction and venue unaffected. But 524(a) applies only to a claim that was actually discharged. recently illustrated this principle in Board of Mgrs. Guides, Books by Topic (Index), Statutes A defendant who pleads duress admits commission of the alleged criminal act but denies any criminal intent. (As amended Feb. 28, 1966, eff. The provisions ofRule 15are available to relieve the defendant of the consequences of any admission subsequently discovered to be incorrect. 99, 101, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Rule 8(a)(1) makes no reference to facts or causes of action. We will use this information to improve this page. Please limit your input to 500 characters. Let's start with the Black's Law Dictionary definition of "affirmative defense": "A defendant's assertion of facts and arguments that, if true, will defeat the plaintiff's or prosecution's claim, even if all the allegations in the complaint are true." <> 2d 136, 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). endstream endobj 437 0 obj <>stream Arts Condominium v Integrated Med. Only three responses are proper: (1) an admission of the allegations of the paragraph; (2) a denial of those allegations; or (3) a disclaimer of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of those allegations. Rule 11 applies by its own terms. matter in the form of an affirmative defense. 14pVP9- r`dZSSWh1 %, Hawes v. Ryder, The difference between the philosophy of Rule 8 and that of former Massachusetts pleading practice emerges vividly from a comparison of the "substantial justice" construction requirement of Rule 8(f) with G.L. The affirmative defenses listed in Rule 8(c) are only a partial list of defenses which should be set forth affirmatively and the rule provides that any "matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense" must be pleaded. Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration and Award, Assumption of the Risk, Contributory Negligence, Discharge in Bankruptcy, Duress, Estoppel, Failure of Consideration, . "An affirmative defense is a defense which admits the cause of action [asserted in the plaintiff's complaint], but avoids liability, in whole or in part, by alleging an excuse, justification, or other matter negating or limiting liability." As a general rule, the defense would be deemed waived. (b) A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. 8. affirmative defense. Professionals, PLLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 51588(U) (Sup Ct, Suffolk County Oct. 8, 2019). Compare also [former] Equity Rule 18 (PleadingsTechnical Forms Abrogated). This is of course the natural corollary of the notice pleading theory behind the Rules generally and Rule 8(a) in particular. c. 231, 85Band85Care intertwined with the provisions of 85A. P. 1.140(b). hAk0A^cL!a2lC 7. John Hinckley Rule 8(e)(2) permits a party to state as many separate claims or defenses as he has, regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or equitable grounds. Laws, and Rules, Keyword Representatives, House %%EOF Deletion of former Rule 8(e)(2)s whether based on legal, equitable, or maritime grounds reflects the parallel deletions in Rule 1 and elsewhere. Besides a waste of printer ink, insufficiently pled and fake affirmative defenses bog down the litigation and may permit an opposing party to engage in an otherwise impermissible fishing expedition disguised as permissible discovery to supposedly bolster a valid affirmative defense. . "[F]amiliar illustrations" of such defenses include those based on a "statute of limitations, absence of proper parties, res judicata, usury, a If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for doing so. Please limit your input to 500 characters. A party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency. (a) Claim for Relief. Archive, Session Laws In . Coughlin v. Coughlin, 312 Mass. See Rule 19(c) for the requirement of a statement in a claim for relief of the names of persons who ought to be parties and the reason for their omission. This requirement was omitted from Rule 8(b) for several reasons: (1) Unlike the questions of the genuineness of a signature or the public ownership of a place, which are susceptible of definite answers and will not often be denied, the legal relationship between the registered owner of a motor vehicle and its operator will often call for a conclusion upon which reasonable minds may differ. 2 0 obj Under 11 U.S.C. Do not let the opposing party's insufficiently pled or fake affirmative defenses walk with a ball instead of retiring it with a strike by blowing this deadline. Subdivision (c)(1). A Reminder From The Commercial Division That Disloyalty Doesnt Pay Literally! In this respect, it differs fromG.L. Time Capsule, Fiscal These changes are intended to be stylistic only. 523(a) are excepted from discharge. Tropical Exterminators, Inc. v. Murray, 171 So. An allegation in any pleading that a place is a public way shall be taken as admitted unless a party specifically denies such allegation. endobj & Video Archives, Session and Legislative Business, House Present, Legislative Spreadsheet, Minnesota A properly pled affirmative defense includes ultimate facts sufficient to provide notice of the proof the defendant intends to rely upon to defeat the plaintiffs claim. S. Fla. Coastal Elec., Inc. v. Treasure on the Bay II Condo Assn, 89 So. Learn more in our Cookie Policy. 2d 483, 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). endobj (1) In General. , ](m7v$Eg~^e&,>Ce(vK)4cw8KUw\%,3Li)}/Ys[ZBY]fY8|9`T P5lI +PGU?%F\. Introductions, Fiscal Audio/Video, Legislative Research, In response, ASI commenced the action.

what affirmative defenses must be pled 2023